Spring Breakers (2012) Review

Spring Breakers

By Benjamin Owens

 

For a film that perpetrates itself with the dangerous excesses of the Millennial generation, using drugs, sex, and depravity, eventually spiraling into a criminal underworld, Spring Breakers ironically takes several steps towards tameness when compared to Hormany Korine’s previous work like Gummo and Trash Humpers. Whether this is a conscious step towards commercialism, aided by the casting of stars James Franco and Selena Gomez, or merely a subconscious reality reflecting the youth it depicts, or more probably something in between, is entirely arguable.

 

Spring Breakers is the story of four college girls who cannot live with the mundane existence of seeing the same things everyday, who’s only perceived escape is spring break in Daytona Beach. In order to make this a reality, the three characters who are not an immediate byproduct of Disney rob a restaurant. Selena Gomez learns of this immediately, and it makes her a little uncomfortable, but who is she to not give in to the peer pressure of her kindergarten friends that her quasi-cool Christian friends warn have the devil in them. No, rather than question this, they make a train of spanking each other in a hallway while singing It’s Getting Hot in Here. Maybe these events are less connected than the juxtaposition would infer, but the cyclical-montage editing style blurs all thematic implications—we’ll get to that more later.

 

Once at Daytona Beach, the girls partake in the profound, self-affirming excess of drinking a lot, riding scooters around, and singing pop songs. We know this is profound because we are told this with exposition in a one-sided phone conversation Selena Gomez has with her grandmother that is played at least five times throughout the film, even long after she’s decided things have gotten too intense and goes home. This ‘profoundness’ is translated visually through montages of half-naked twenty-somethings (I hope) pouring booze over their bodies while dancing to Skrillex, with the same shots sometimes repeating three or four times. Luckily, the film’s cinematography, and specifically it’s lighting, with sunset-soaked landscapes and neon-soaked rooms taken straight out of a Tangerine Dream, is actually quite profound, which leads to the believability of the girls’ perspectives of this. However, without this profoundness being translated to plot or character development, and inversely with the depths of their depravity being far too limited to speak to this with contrast, whatever profoundness these characters speak of is purely exposition.

 

Even more so than much of the motivation and character development being exposited through phone messages, my biggest issue with the film is the repetitious style of editing I mentioned before. Huge swaths of the film are montaged through an A-B-A-C-A type of structure in which we may see the same meaningless shot of James Franco’s car five times for no apparent reason, other than too discombobulate or simulate drugs, but as a person who has done drugs, it does not work. When we first see James Franco’s twin cronies cutting drugs when we are introduced to the extravagances of his house, then again the exact shots of them doing it at the end of the second act, when it is communicated that they are in his bedroom while he is having a fear-based pre-death emotional crisis, nothing is gained technically, thematically, in the story, or in any other way. This is just one example of many. I have nothing against repetition or cyclical structure; in fact, I often appreciate it, but technical devices should have thematic implication—repetition should build and eventually climax, cycles should reveal new information with gained perspective—none of which this film does. No new information is gained by seeing these same images or hearing these same monologues in a different context, rather it appears to be a choice inspired by the economy of the shot. This device is comically ironic, really; if the characters’ motivation is that they are bored because they see the same things over and over again, why would Korine show us the same things over and over again unless he intends to bore us?

 

The part of me that can appreciate three girls wearing purple tiger swimsuits with pink unicorn ski-masks and holding machine guns while dancing to a Britney Spears song sung by James Franco desperately wanted to like this movie, but the part of me that understood no law enforcement agency would ever allow four girls to spend two days in county wearing only their bikinis simply would not let me.

You may also like

16 Comments

  1. CLINIQUE 倩碧線上購物官網。瀏覽Clinique倩碧官方網站,了解更多線上購物、護膚、彩粧、香氛及禮品詳情。通過過敏性測試,百分百不含香料。

  2. 南韓換總統,網民焦點居然放在身旁的總統保鑣Oppa身上! Marie Claire (HK) Edition 可能你連南韓新任總統叫文在寅也不太知道,但你不能不知道他身旁的總統保鑣是誰! 這位擔盡總統風頭的是來自韓國特戰隊的軍官出身的崔榮宰, 現今36歲。外表又英又俊的他,根本就像是電影中扮演保鑣的明星

  3. 它讓神經原在常規的緊張鍛煉中進行共振燃燒,由此帶來健身運動所無法達到的效果。Ion Magnum複雜的振動波是基于於二十多年對神經原燃燒信號的研究手工製作的。 設備製造者的臨床研究結果顯示,30分鐘的治療相當於在健身房10個小時的運動,可以燃燒高達5000卡路里的熱量。其他臨床研究顯示肌肉生成的速度以及脂肪(表面脂肪以及深部脂肪)减少的速度相應都比運動的效果更好。對於Ion Magnum沒有進行理療的部位,甚至會有抗衰老防氧化的效果。 有受試者治療一次之後同一個部位减掉了3-4英寸(不像其他减肥治療中宣稱的那樣,一次治療减掉了5英寸,但那是全身20多個部位加起來减掉的尺寸)。同時,它還可以减掉脖子和下巴的脂肪,讓你的雙下巴消失 . 每次治療需要25分鐘。治療前後的效果非常明顯,而且會持續1-2天。要想達到更好的效果,最好接受1-2個小時的治療。

  4. Unquestionably believe that that you stated. Your favourite reason seemed to
    be at the net the simplest factor to understand of. I say to you, I definitely get annoyed even as folks think about worries that they plainly do not realize about.
    You controlled to hit the nail upon the top and also defined out the entire thing without
    having side effect , people could take a signal. Will probably be again to get more.
    Thanks

  5. I’m extremely impressed together with your writing skills as neatly as with the layout on your weblog. Is that this a paid theme or did you modify it yourself? Either way stay up the excellent quality writing, it is uncommon to look a great blog like this one these days..

  6. My brother suggested I might like this blog. He
    was entirely right. This post truly made my day.
    You can not imagine simply how much time I had spent for this
    info! Thanks!

  7. Its such as you learn my thoughts! You appear to understand a lot about this, like you wrote
    the e book in it or something. I think that you just can do with some percent to power the message house a
    little bit, however instead of that, this is wonderful blog.
    A fantastic read. I’ll definitely be back.

  8. Hola! I’ve been reading your weblog for a while now
    and finally got the courage to go ahead and
    give you a shout out from Dallas Texas! Just wanted to tell you keep up the good job!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *